Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 214823
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:24:40+00:00 2026-05-11T18:24:40+00:00

Q1 Book suggests that before we register new SqlProfileProvider , we should remove any

  • 0

Q1
Book suggests that before we register new SqlProfileProvider, we should remove any existing profile providers using <clear> element. But:

A) why must we use <clear> instead of <remove>?

B) I assume that root web.config or machine.config don’t register (by default) any profile provider, and thus using <clear> element is not necessary?

Q2
I assume reason why each profile property doesn’t have a corresponding column in a database table ( instead all properties are stored into a single field ) is due to the fact each time we would add and remove profile properties, we would also need to change table schema?

thanx

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:24:41+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:24 pm

    Actually, the AspNetSqlProfileProvider (of type System.Web.Profile.SqlProfileProvider) is added by default in machine.config. Take a look at your C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\CONFIG directory (or another location). However, it is not registered as the default provider there. So if you are satisfied with the default settings, it is enough to use the following configuration:

    <profile enabled="true" defaultProvider="AspNetSqlProfileProvider" />
    

    If you want to use a custom provider, it’s usually a good idea to clear all existing providers (although not necessary) and name another default provider.

    The reason for not using remove is that it requires a name attribute, which you may not know. Using clear removes all previously registered profile providers, using remove removes just one by name.

    Concerning Q2 you´re correct. The database scheme that is used must be general enough to accomodate lots of different properties (and types of properties).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The book, Producing Open Source Software , suggests that it's better to have lengthy
I was reading Steven Sanderson's book Pro ASP.NET MVC Framework and he suggests using
In page 40 of Marcus Zarra's Core Data book, he suggests that, since NSTreeController
Reading the reviews at Amazon and ACCU suggests that John Lakos' book, Large-Scale C++
The layering scheme for DDD suggests that the layers should be; Presentation/Application/Domain/Infrastructure The diagram
The camel book suggests that V-strings can be used for representing IPv4 addresses: $ipaddr
I am reading Josh Bloch's book Effective Java and he suggests using a builder
I've set up our SVN repository like the Subversion book suggests, and this is
The book that I purchased to help with my SSIS understanding seems to have
A) Book I’m learning from says that if we handle Login.Authenticate event, then we

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.