Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5988649
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:59:16+00:00 2026-05-22T22:59:16+00:00

Which is better to use as a performance perspective: $(.div1 h2, .div1 h3) or

  • 0

Which is better to use as a performance perspective:

$(".div1 h2, .div1 h3")

or

$(".div1").find("h2, h3")
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:59:17+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:59 pm

    The answer to your question is: yes.

    Don’t worry about the performance difference, unless your code is slow. If it is, use a profiler to determine bottlenecks.

    From an analysis standpoint:

    $(".div1 h2, div1 h3")
    

    should be faster as jQuery will pipe it through querySelectorAll (if it exists) and native code will run faster than non-native code. It will also save on an additional function call.

    $(".div1").find("h2, h3")
    

    is better if you plan on chaining some other functions on .div1:

    $(".div1").find("h2, h3").addClass('foo').end().show();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Which of these is better to use in regard to performance? ...in regard to
are there speed/performance differences between caf and mp3? Which format is better to use
Which is better from a performance perspective? Accessing a Global Application Variable (Application[foo]) versus
Which is better to use in PHP, a 2D array or a class? I've
In VB.NET, which is better to use: function overloading or default parameters?
If the value of @param is null, which is better to use: WHERE t.column
Which is better way to use jQuery() ? I've heard that jQuery(element) doesn't ruin
Which approach is better to use if I need a member (sp or func)
Which one is better to use when it come to return value for example
Which approach is better: 1) to use a third-party ORM system or 2) manually

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.