Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8665679
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T17:32:36+00:00 2026-06-12T17:32:36+00:00

Why isn’t this code compiling ? #include <cstdlib> #include <list> template < typename Type

  • 0

Why isn’t this code compiling ?

#include <cstdlib>
#include <list>

template < typename Type >
class Allocator {
public:
    using value_type = Type;
public:
    template < typename Other >
    struct rebind { using other = Allocator< Other >; };
public:
    Type * allocate( std::size_t n ) { return std::malloc( n ); }
    void deallocate( Type * p, std::size_t ) throw ( ) { std::free( p ); }
};

int main( void ) {
    std::list< void *, Allocator< void * > > list;
    return 0;
}

It seems to need pointer, reference, pointer_const & reference_const types. However, according to cppreference these members are all optionals. It seems like if the STL weren’t using allocator_trait (I’m compiling with -std=c++11 so it should be good).

Any idea ?

[edit] On clang, errors are :

user@/tmp > clang++ -std=c++11 test.cc
In file included from test.cc:2:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../include/c++/4.7.1/list:63:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../include/c++/4.7.1/bits/stl_list.h:449:40: error: no type named 'pointer' in 'Allocator<void *>'
      typedef typename _Tp_alloc_type::pointer           pointer;
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
test.cc:17:46: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::list<void *, Allocator<void *> >' requested here
    std::list< void *, Allocator< void * > > list;
                                             ^
In file included from test.cc:2:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../include/c++/4.7.1/list:63:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../include/c++/4.7.1/bits/stl_list.h:450:40: error: no type named 'const_pointer' in 'Allocator<void *>'
      typedef typename _Tp_alloc_type::const_pointer     const_pointer;
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../include/c++/4.7.1/bits/stl_list.h:451:40: error: no type named 'reference' in 'Allocator<void *>'
      typedef typename _Tp_alloc_type::reference         reference;
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../include/c++/4.7.1/bits/stl_list.h:452:40: error: no type named 'const_reference' in 'Allocator<void *>'
      typedef typename _Tp_alloc_type::const_reference   const_reference;
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4 errors generated.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T17:32:38+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 5:32 pm

    This is a bug in GCC’s C++ standard library.

    When using a list, they are not properly wrapping access to the allocator through an allocator_traits.

    However, they do implement vector correctly. This code would compile if you used std::vector instead of std::list.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Isn't var a keyword in C#? But why can I do this: public class
This isn't legal: public class MyBaseClass { public MyBaseClass() {} public MyBaseClass(object arg) {}
This isn't working the way I expect it to. Sample input will include an
Isn't this supposed to produce a segfault? When I run the code the output
Isn't there any way to find the class-type of a generic? if (T instanceof
Isn't MVC supposed to separate the presentational code from everything else? Wouldn't this make
Isn't having String enough? Just as an example, why can String class lets you
Isn't there another way of using global variables in a Java stlye manner in
Isn't A a = new A(); // A is a class name supposed to
Isn't visual studio supposed to automatically generate this file for each webservice creation ?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.