Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7014491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T22:31:40+00:00 2026-05-27T22:31:40+00:00

I have a function in a program called with this assembly: push xxx push

  • 0

I have a function in a program called with this assembly:

push xxx
push xxx
call xxx
add esp, xxx

From what I know this function has the cdecl calling convention.
In GCC I use __attribute__((cdecl)) to make another function act the same as the above function.

But when I debugged it this assembly was shown:

push xxx
push xxx
call xxx

there is no add esp, xxx!

What calling convention should I use in order to produce the same assembly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T22:31:41+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:31 pm

    I doubt this has anything to do with calling conventions, and is more likely to do with a compiler optimization like “defer-pop” (where the compiler will wait to pop the stack until later on)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple assembly function called from a c program and I have
I have a C program which has a function call that is defined in
so I have this function which gets called multiple times during my program. //global
I am writing an assembly function to be called from C that will call
I have this function: Program A public ICollection<ReportLocationInfo> GetAllReportsInstalled() { return _Reports; } I
I have a program in Octave that has a loop - running a function
I have a C++ program called myArchive that calls routines from a static C
I have got this function in my program. def time(transcriptionFile) : ''' This function
I have a function that, when called, takes a struct Pieces* field from a
I am trying to call on another program to perform a function (I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.